By the condition of creating Love, I understand the purpose of any Book. They all have something to teach, about reality, about our self's. By logic, you can love living beings or objects, if is your choice to try to make that object "better", that was originally, since Love is only dedication and being able to "exclude what you want for yourself, by the desire to see someone else, better, which include to Teach and inform, nothing more, without any punishment desire as a behavior of those who wish to be in control of everything, without the ability to deal with errors and unexpected feedbacks"
Loving a Book, creates the need to see in reality what the book describe. Daoism Books can be a bit "superficial", if you have a child in your mind, which is not bad, since we all need to learn and in that process, a transformation of the self happen, becoming something else, without changing the self.
In Daoism readings, the Unexpected and Unpredictability of Life is what we can Expect, while many other Books, they only expect what they define that should be expected and with it, create mechanisms of exclusion, rejection and revange in the condition of dealing with the unexpectable.
Like all software or operating systems in the world, they all can be updated in a "compulsive and rational" way, to become better, and they will continue like that, for all eternity, so if you think, all could try to create better religions, with more conscience about human fragilities, but in so many centuries of history, that desire was not in humanity, but their choice was to be "stop in time", without feeling the need to update or upgrade, everything they are. There are many books that are based and inspired by other books, creating a "continuity" of how the first book could be different, creating something new, which is natural because is Organic, like we all are, like we all shall be for eternity.
Well, now that we have robots we can exterminate human kind and see robots living in peace for eternity. If You Wish!
Maybe the ability to think was not in the main intention, but only (control). In that case, the lesson is that you had the desire to become God and naturally fail, since God don't control anything, if not only, being a "guide" in your own mind, when you make your choices.
The Non-Believers are thankful to "what they cannot control", which can be the definition of God, while they don't Love God, since you can only Love living beings or subject/objects (in the condition of working to make it better), since that is your lesson and dutty to be in reality, that is the objective of your soul and therefor, to be able to love God, you need to focus on your choices in reality, nothing more, which is what non-believers normally do, even if the condition of believing is not mandatory to God, but only, each one choice in reality (only).
Some religious groups try to become better, like the Christians and all sub-religions that come from Judeism, which are Prostestantism, Catholicism and naturally Christianity, by trying to help others, while other perspectives were created in Time, by creative persons on Brasil and Africa, which make their religions a interesting perspective of spirituality, at least in my opinion. Not all feel any need to punish others, while in their education process, there is a lot of punishment, by the same condition who deny, mainly with children and woman. Too much violence against others in that "Biblical condition", that explain human behaviors, human choices, while only the ones who question, can create something better.
While my choice was to create something, and to try to teach about simplicity, I don't feel any desire to punish those who deny my will.